17 Jun 2018 11:08:50
After a Great season for him, Alex McCarthy has to have a pay increase, how can our No 1 goalkeeper be earning less than our no 2 (fraser) >> Pay him or lose him! Thoughts!


1.) 17 Jun 2018
17 Jun 2018 11:40:24
Forster is one of, if not the highest earner at our club (although I think Lemina and Gabs earn a bit more) and as good as he was at the back end of last season, increasing McCarthy's wages to the point of being more than Fraser's will take a hit on our wage budget. Increasing his wages by that much just because people are uncomfortable with the idea that our current number two earns more than our first choice is a bad move. However, I do think Fraser is on too much to sit on the bench. Would rather move him on and sign someone who will be on less and then increase McCarthy's wages (because let's be honest, he earned it), but rationalized within our current wage budget means so that it stays stable. Wouldn't want our top 5 paid players in the club to have 2 goalkeepers now do we? Just my opinion.


2.) 18 Jun 2018
18 Jun 2018 16:27:40
It's a shame we just can't decrease salaries for poor performance.


3.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 19:56:05
So We Must get rid of Fraser! and give McCarthay a pay rise to equal what Fraser was on .
Sorry, If we don't get rid of Fraser . Then you have to pay your No1 more, whatever the pay structure may be . I would be dam upset if I earned less than my Apprentice . Pay him or Loose him!


4.) 20 Jun 2018
20 Jun 2018 16:17:13
Mate I wish we could get rid of fraser. I think it's extremely unfair that the man who played a key role in us staying in the division hasn't earned as much as the man who made costly errors that almost brought us down (not entirely his fault though) . But the matter of the problem is nobody is in or will be in for him. I'm not even sure saints are open to offers. Thought Watford or West Ham would be in for him but obviously not the case.