Southampton Rumours Archive August 10 2012
Use our rumours form to send us soutthampton transfer rumours.
10 Aug 2012 19:02:45
Wolves rejected west hams 9 million bid, can't see us bidding much higher!!
Believable4
Unbelievable5
West ham have bid £9m, but it's an initial fee of £6m + a further £3m in add ons so you never know but does seem unlikely
Mini-Saint
Agree1
Disagree1
Wolves have released a statement saying that they have rejected ANOTHER bid for Matt Jarvis. Probably west ham tho
Agree1
Disagree2
I'm sorry for your misinformation but west ham have not bid 9 million for any player this transfer window, you really need to start getting some facts on this site. {Ed003's Note - Must have been £4.7m and the rest agents fees ;) }
Agree4
Disagree1
I did hear you offered considerably more than 9 million for Andy Carroll. I believe the bid was in the high teens. Admittedly it was clearly never going to happen cause Carroll views himself too highly but it was a much larger bid than 9 million. (This was confirmed by SkySports and reported on the BBC a few weeks back).
Agree2
Disagree1
No bid was ever forthcoming, it never got that far, Liverpool approached Carroll about interest from Wet spam and he made it quite clear that he had no intention of going there either via a transfer or a loan and the 19 million pound figure was pure speculation.
Agree0
Disagree0
He's handed in a transfer request. Depends where he wants to go now
Agree0
Disagree0
West Ham actually bid on the never never. Hell knows what strings were applied on the Carroll bid in addition to the unlikely outcome of them staying up :D
Huey
Agree0
Disagree0
10 Aug 2012 16:23:25
Wolves have rejected 9m bid for Javis from Westham
so i dont think our 6m got a look in
Chalkie
Believable2
Unbelievable4
I imagine that'll mean Southampton would bid higher than 6 then.
Agree1
Disagree1
10 Aug 2012 12:14:15
Heard from a reasonable source on twitter, that Danny rose on loan is "Possible" and we have "registered our interest in him among athlete clubs" And he also said that he can't see Wolves selling Jarvis for £6m. Don't know whether that means we have bid for him or not.
On another note, Id like to see Karim Frei at saints! :)
Mini-Saint
Believable5
Unbelievable7
Mini - i also heard that Rose has 3 clubs interested in him on loan - saints in line to take him first
I think 6m for Javis is a starting price, But strong rumours he's arriving today
Chalkie
Agree1
Disagree2
* other clubs
Mini-Saint
Agree0
Disagree1
Villa, Wolves, QPR and Wigan all linked with Rose
Mini -Saint
Agree1
Disagree1
I read that west ham had a £9 million pound offer turned down for jarvis
Agree0
Disagree1
10 Aug 2012 11:50:52
Many seem to think the buttner transfer is still on and that it has gone to an arbitration case to dispute the third party fee. This would explain the length of time take to complete the transfer as an arbitration case s a slow long process, poissibility of him still signing?
Jas93
Believable3
Unbelievable11
It was reported in papers today that it collapsed and we are now looking at Danny Rose
JustASaint
Agree3
Disagree2
As far as I read it, its not arbitration over the 3rd party fees. Buttner wants Vitesse to cancel his contract as he has been frozen out of their team over this whole saga. I would think he won't win and we won't sign him.
Agree3
Disagree1
Don't trust the papers they are speculating as much as we are.
Agree1
Disagree1
Ah ok, and danny rose would be a superb signing, hopefully we could push an option to buy into the loan deal:)
Jas93
Agree1
Disagree3
Yeah not bad idea Jas93, I think he can be one to watch in the future
JustASaint
Agree0
Disagree0
If we are thinking of loaning any player, it has to be with an option to buy or what is the point of loaning them?
Otherwise we are just behaving like another club's nurse maid for players. A dead end for us.
Agree0
Disagree1
If all clubs viewed loans like that no club would loan at all.
Agree1
Disagree0
Exactly. Only broke clubs or poorly managed clubs generally take players on loan. We admittedly took Falque last season but only as cover.
Look at Bolton last season. Stayed up season before on the basis of loaned Sturridge goals. Once he went back, they had nothing and went down. Time that should have been spent finding their own player rather than begging Chelsea to have him back
Agree0
Disagree0
10 Aug 2012 10:21:59
Daily Star reporting today Saints on the verge of signing Matt Jarvis for £6mil.
Believable2
Unbelievable3
It's true, it's in the Star, but that means nothing. I really hope we do sign him but I've heard west ham have had a bid of £9m rejected. Never say never tho!
Mini-Saint
Agree3
Disagree1
West Ham supposed 6 million + 3 million unguaranteed add ons. So if Saints want him they need to get the cheque book out.
Agree0
Disagree2
The West Ham story isn't true they didn't bid for Jarvis, they've looked at it but they want to look for other players first.
Agree1
Disagree1
I dont think west ham have increased here bid to £9m, as far as i know they bid £4.5m a while back but wolves were demanding to much so WestHam left it alone, but now that it looks likely that Fletcher is leaving wolves maybe jarvis is doubting the ambitions of the club and the ability to get back to the PL next year and so ants to jump ship.
Jas93
Agree0
Disagree1
West Ham don't have £2m , let alone £6m!!
Who is their most expensive signing of the close season... or have they all been free agents? A lot of talk, bvluff and bluster, buit no cash.
Maybe if West Ham hadn't spent £4.3m on agents fees last season.... Ho ho ho
Agree0
Disagree0
10 Aug 2012 00:31:12
Rumours of Liam Trotter of Millwall surfacing in the press again, good player but not sure if ready for premiership football.
Believable5
Unbelievable8
We dont need anymore unproven players waste of time if its true
Agree8
Disagree3
I would welcome this if true. One of the stand out players in the Championship last season.
Having said that, the priority has to be an injection of pace out wide and some defensive reinforcement.
Agree3
Disagree4
10 Aug 2012 00:15:54
Southampton are interested in Danny Rose after he was loan listed by AVB.
Believable10
Unbelievable5
I think we should jump for Bassong since AVB has said he can go...he's still relatively young and could be what we're looking for as a centre back
Agree6
Disagree4
Would be a good signing, always rated him as a decent young player. but scott sinclair is available for 8million (brian laudrups words) could be worth signing them both with rose on loan - chris
Agree5
Disagree1
I'd like to take Rose down to St Marys. He's never had what you would call a "run" in the Spurs side so he may surprise a few people. Maybe take out an option to buy at the end of the loan, just in case. He's still fairly young and always looks keen every time i've seen him play
SPORTsoup
Agree4
Disagree0
Rose was complete rubbish playing for GB
Agree4
Disagree3
I'd love to get Scott Sinclair. I mean we've got Jake as a forward in our youth so that'd be an attraction to move him to us. We can afford him I reckon within the set wage budget. Also agree with the Bassong comment he'd be a good signing. I'm just not so keen on Danny Rose.
Agree4
Disagree1
Sinclairs goin to man city
Agree1
Disagree5
He won't go to man city, a club where he won't be played what would be the point?
Agree1
Disagree0