Southampton Rumours Member Posts

 

Saints123's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Saints123's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Saints123's Posts

 

 

To Saints123's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Saints123's last 5 banter posts

 

To Saints123's last 5 rumour replies

 

To Saints123's last 5 banter replies

 

Saints123's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Saints123's rumours posts

 

06 Jun 2018 20:12:28
Liverpool apparently now in for Shaqiri. Smart move, cut out the middle man and just go straight for the players we're linked with.

Saints123

1.) 07 Jun 2018 12:30:36
haha. If 12M is true, I would quite like him here.


 

 

08 Apr 2018 11:43:03
Huge game today. Not just about the result, we need to go out there and make a statement that we're not going down without a fight.

If we have a go at them and lose, fine. They're a top 6 team and they're better than us. I'm just not sure I can stand to watch another performance like we saw against Newcastle and West Ham.

As a side note, why does anyone think that Shane Long is the answer for us? The bloke can't score. Southampton fans seem to consistently kid themselves that the grass is greener and change for the sake of change produces results. We did it when we engineered Puel's sacking. We did it throughout Pellegrino's reign, and in sacking Pellegrino as well which already looks like it's not making much difference. Just because long is a hard worker and doesn't have the same accusations of laziness thrown his way as someone like Gabbi, doesn't mean that he's going to suddenly develop the end product that he's never had.

Saints123

1.) 08 Apr 2018 13:32:14
Just seen the team sheet. apparently our manager disagrees with me!

Shane Long hat-trick and I'll be eating some of the best tasting humble pie anyone could have come 4pm lol.


2.) 08 Apr 2018 15:58:02
Just a slice will do. better performance shame not to get a point really. Arsenal is still arsenal no matter the 11 starting and no shame in today.


3.) 08 Apr 2018 16:42:12
HI guys

Just watched the match two very important points what on earth does the managers past and present see in dusan tadic, he is one of the worst players I have seen in a long long time, he contributes absolutely nothing but the last three managers have all played him does he hold something over the club? second point is our defence is appalling not a decent defender amongst them. No wonder were in this position we can't hold on to a lead, how many games have we been infront and ended up losing I don't care if we stay up or go down I won't buy another season ticket .


4.) 08 Apr 2018 19:22:45
Today we played well
All over the park players actually showed up
Shane held the line up front and our defence were shaky at times but held their own
Even though we lost we played better and if we can take this game onto our next we have a chance against the lesser teams we’ve got to come up against
So it’s not all doom and gloom from today.


5.) 09 Apr 2018 18:40:17
Completely agree Diggy. There were still errors which aren't good enough, but it's time we accept that won't be fixed until next season. They showed fight, which is the big thing I wanted to see.

Also agree completely re. Tadic. I just don't get it. He's consistently poor. There was one moment yesterday when Shane squared it and Tadic had to beat one of Arsenal's defenders to the ball. It wasn't even a 50/ 50.Tadic was favourite to get there, and he just completely bi***d out of the challenge. That, for me, is criminal, particularly in the midst of a relegation scrap. Honestly if I was MH I wouldn't have cared that it was about 10 mins in. I'd have ripped him off the pitch there and then and he wouldn't have got back on it until he'd won 100 50/ 50s on the training pitch. I feel like that is the sort of accountability we lack.


6.) 10 Apr 2018 11:47:20
123 - totally agree. I thought he could have done more to prevent the cross for the (third I think) goal.


 

 

25 Jan 2018 20:53:11
Eds are you hearing any names linked to the saints other than Carillo and Promes? Just curious, the rumours seem to all be about those two.

Saints123

{Ed002's Note - Nicolas Gaitan remains of interest as a loanee but it might prove difficult. Interest remains in Ben Godfrey but nothing can now happen until the summer.}


 

 

27 Jul 2017 08:40:09
Patrick Roberts rumours seem to be gathering steam - Eds any idea on whether this is likely, and whether it is likely to be a loan or a permanent transfer?

Think he could be a good buy for us, but personally I wouldn't't want him unless there's at least an option to buy.

Saints123

1.) 27 Jul 2017 12:17:27
If we want this type of player I don't understand why we didn't get Murphy now of Newcastle. Much better player all round!


 

 

14 Jul 2017 16:17:05
Eds any idea what's going on with Chalobah? Seen reports of us linked and some of him signing a 5-year deal with Watford.

Think he'd be a good signing for us and reasonably priced too hopefully with only 1 year left on his deal.

Saints123

{Ed002's Note - He has moved to Watford S123.}


1.) 14 Jul 2017 17:00:33
Shame, know if we were interested or just rumour?


2.) 15 Jul 2017 15:51:01
Why do you need to know whether we were interested or not? Too late, don't matter, move on guys 😇.


3.) 15 Jul 2017 16:22:27
Just curious.

{Ed002's Note - No. Southampton enquired after two other Chelsea players but not Chalobah. All three have moved on now.}


4.) 15 Jul 2017 18:45:30
Ok thanks for the info Ed (as always)


 

 

 

Saints123's banter posts with other poster's replies to Saints123's banter posts

 

05 Oct 2018 08:29:23
Bit out of left field, and not too sure if he'd come after being linked with Arsenal, but Mikel Arteta? I'd have thought we're a reasonable start for his career, since a top 6 team seems overly optomistic with no real experience yet. Michael Carrick is another similar guy that comes to mind, but maybe he's a few years as a number 2 away from being ready to manage.

Saints123

1.) 05 Oct 2018 20:01:49
Interesting shout. He has played quite an important role coaching at City and I understand he was very close to being selected by Arsenal last summer before they bottled it and went for experience. Not sure he showed much though when he was stand-in head coach for their first Champions league game. Would be quite the gamble. But rather someone like him than any of Moyes, Allardyce, Pulis, Bruce etc. At least if we take a gamble it looks the club are trying to shake us out of this slumber.


2.) 06 Oct 2018 15:23:14
Exactly - I think it's a gamble to hire a manager like the ones you named as well, in terms of risking continuing our current stagnation.

Thoughts on Carrick? Hardly receiving the best tutelage under Mourinho right now but he's always had an outstanding football brain and seems destined for management eventually.


3.) 06 Oct 2018 21:16:33
Carrick still feels a little green around the gills to me. Its one thing being an intelligent footballer playing under good managers and with some of the best players in the world, but we're talking now about the right personality to not only have a good football brain but be a motivator and an excellent coach, someone with an eye for current talent and potential and how best to utilise it.

I'm all for gambling but the risk of failure is much higher with someone with such limited experience. I think managers need to show they have the required skillset and its not as simple as hiring someone who was a good footballer, an intelligent footballer or even a good coach. Managers aren't always the best coaches, nor ex-top pros. I appreciate you understand this more than some.

Its just a bit of a catch 22 because how do you find out if a coach or someone with limited experience is capable without giving them a try? I'm just not sure our pool of options should be so broad as to consider everyone, nor should it be so narrow as to focus just on current managers with or without Premier League experience. I'm happy for the club to take a gamble on someone and stand by them and give them time to make a change. But not such a gamble that the chances of success are intangible guess work.


4.) 08 Oct 2018 00:45:38
Hi guys

Another very disapointing performance,5 points from a possible 24 is quite simply pitiful. We have spent £50m over the summer and we are worse than last season, and we thought that impossible. I will be honest I thought MH was a good choice but we are still facing the same issues, we can't score, we can't defend.
There seems to be a real lack of quality manager potential replacements so we jump from the frying pan into the fire. We now have 2 weeks where presumably the management sit down with MH and training staff and acknowledge what is happening is not acceptable, training whatever is not working and we have to totally rethink our current methods. We are so far away from playing modern possession based football, we struggle to string 5 passes together,
to pass out from the back on the floor is an impossible dream, players lacking confidence, also unwilling to take responsibility, we all know that with this squad we should not be in this situation, look at what Eddie Howe has done at bmth, play attractive football, very competitive score goals keep clean sheets, soccer is not complicated so let's see what happens. coyr.


5.) 08 Oct 2018 22:40:30
I've said it before and i'll say it again . I was absolutely shocked to see that MH had none won two PL games in a row since Nov/ Dec 2016!
And that sums up exactly what we are seeing here. MH does not know how to hold on to a lead or come from behind. What is happening here at SFC is a mirror of his previous managerial appointments. He just doesn't know how to win. Winning games is an absolute prerequisite of not just staying in the PL but being succesful within it.
It's not going to get any better . his past record shows that.

Southampton has to be brave now and accept their mistake (again) . It's not like he has a record of achievement; he has a record of non achievement.

So as a few posters have said, get rid of MH and replace by who?
well MR Black Box . wherever/ however you found M Poch . go do it again!
Or . we are heading out of the PL . and if we do survive, it will be a struggle . for the team and the fans.


6.) 08 Oct 2018 22:51:28
Definitely agree VintageSaint. The board should be telling MH and his gang to step up. It's quite embarrassing that we spent that much over summer break and are in the position we are. Coaching staff needs to change but, as you said, there doesn't seem to be any quality replacement unless we go with a fresh manager who may or may not have better luck.

Our players need to sit down with management and be told they need to work better. This isn't Sunday league it's the best league in the world and if they don't change or even put more effort at simple things like passing, then good riddence.


 

 

01 Oct 2018 09:12:24
What's everyone thinking then?

Last year I was a big believer in giving MP time to work. This year I'm torn. On one hand I want us to do the same with Hughes and not become a team that just switches manager with every run of form. On the other hand, I didn't think Hughes was the right man when we hired him, didn't think he was the right man when we extended him, and still don't think he's the right man now!

We have looked completely anaemic, and but for Danny Ings would really be in the thick of the relegation zone right now. I fear even the shot in the arm that Ings gave us could wear off with too much more of this. What worries me most is hearing Hughes talk post-match. No responsibility or accountability, we're always unlucky and he seems to take some bizarre pride in not getting hammered! He loves to say we don't 'manage games' well - I think the issue is the exact opposite. Stop trying to manage games and gauge your intensity according to the situation. Play football with intensity for 90 minutes in every game, and results will come.

My approach - Hughes has a month to turn things around, then I say get someone else in with some time to evaluate the squad before January. I don't like saying this because it's not typically how you move a club forward, but then neither is hiring Mark Hughes so desperate times!

Saints123

1.) 01 Oct 2018 10:49:52
As you know, I feel exactly the same as you. I don’t rate MH and after 15 games in charge, his points and good record is worse than MP2. Has he made a difference? I don’t think so. Looking at teams like Chelsea and West Ham, with new managers coming in over the summer, new styles of play and looking to get that message across to the players, they were inconsistent at the start of the season (albeit successful as far as Chelsea goes), but the last week has seen them starting to bring things together, be more cohesive and play the new style with more consistency and direction. So surely, if MH was changing things we would see it by now.

Since Koeman, our defence has eroded at a frightening pace. The half court press under his watch was balanced by a stronger attack. Under Puel, that similar approach looked lopsided as our attack faltered. MP2 again took a similar approach but teams had cottoned onto our lack of firepower and could be more adventurous against us. Now, under MH, we commit more bodies forward but that’s leaving us wide open at the back. It was exactly the same problem he had at Stoke. He wants to outscore the opposition every game but fails to see the flaws in the set up of the team. He blames losses on our failure to convert chances, rather than acknowledging too our failure to stop the opposition scoring.

I’m not an advocate for sacking managers after 7 or 8 games if things aren’t going well because I think the club needs stability now. The problem is, they keep on hiring the wrong person as they’ve completely lost touch with the vision and unity that got us back to the Premier League in the first place.

Football has evolved massively in the last decade and I am adamant that some of the old timers have been left behind. Their coaching methods, tactics and approach to the game is no longer good enough to keep up with the new coaching methods brought in by the new generation both home and abroad. Pep is no secret, Julian Nagglesmann, Sarri, Tuchel, Klopp, MP etc. They’re not all young by the way. They are just the new breed of coach/ manager who are looking to innovate and progress and have all found ways of making their teams better and changing the football landscape.

If we want to avoid following the likes of West Brom, Stoke, Sunderland, Newcastle, Swansea, we must look to bring in a new head coach with the ability to revolutionise the way we play football. To create a system and style that will be our blueprint for years to come. Us aside, that’s also what brought Swansea such success but their fate was sealed when they left it behind and went through a string of managers simply hoping for Prem survival each season. We are now in a cycle where we are doing exactly the same. So as far as timing goes, the sooner we correct this error in judgment, the better.

So in my view, our next appointment must be a head coach or manager with an innovative approach who likes the team to play in a way that’s easy on the eye and can make a team better than the sum of its parts. They don’t need to have Prem experience. We then need to give them the time to make the changes they need and give them off the field support to do it. Or endure more torrid football and relegation if not this season then in the near future.


2.) 01 Oct 2018 19:40:34
I agree that we need someone with a new approach but we need to give him time which surely means giving MH his P45 soon. I think that MH is too set in his ways and is unable to change his approach. He has very little idea of how to set up his defence and even though he was a pretty good striker himself he doesn't seem able to get the strikers we have scoring.


3.) 05 Oct 2018 08:28:30
I agree. Young manager with energy, fresh ideas and ambition. The club needs a shake up. The problem is, that is something which is more effectively done over the summer. So I can see an argument that if we think Hughes will keep us up, we should stick with him until then.


 

 

10 Aug 2018 21:56:24
Ok, before the season starts, I thought it would be interesting to see what we want from this year. By this I mean, imagine you're the Chairman, what would you be setting as our targets/ expectations?

In my opinion, pushing for Europe is unrealistic right now. I think I'm looking for the following from the season:

- PL finish of 8-12
- Breakout seasons from some key players to establish a more settled squad with leaders and key players established.
- Anything in the cups is a bonus

Basically, for me this season is about re-establishing ourselves as an up and coming club with a more positive mood around the club, and building a foundation to push on from next year.

Saints123

1.) 11 Aug 2018 09:32:29
Anything better than last year . hopefully more from McQueen, sims and reed. and more direct, exciting attacking football. beyond that. 💁.


 

 

08 Aug 2018 07:41:24
From the sound of it, the most likely signings are now Welbeck or Alcacer, and probably on loan. I'd be happy with either on loan tbh, despite my reservations about signing them permanently.

Saints123

 

 

28 Jun 2018 07:26:41
McCarthy resigned. Vestergaard linked from Gladbach - looks like we're kicking into gear! McCarthy deserves the new deal, and Vestergaard would be a great signing imo.

Saints123

 

 

 

Saints123's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

31 Aug 2018 10:31:20
I get mcQueen, he had two guys in front of him and was never going to get a game. Think this is probably best for Reed's development since he was never going to get enough game time for us, but I had considered him our backup rb, so wonder what our plan is there now he's gone.

Saints123

 

 

Click To View This Thread

12 Aug 2018 22:10:11
Completely agree Diggy, but I actually thought he did a better job of that today than he did last year. He seemed a lot more direct when he got the ball.

Saints123

 

 

Click To View This Thread

06 Aug 2018 23:30:13
I reckon he'll be too expensive personally.

And I don't mean too expensive for us, just that his asking price will be above of his value. If they're looking for 20-30 mil as I expect they would be, then he's not worth that, and we shouldn't pay it out of desperation.

The big ones I'm surprised we haven't worked harder at (in fairness, maybe we have been) are Dembele and Origi. Both are optimistic but plausible in my opinion.

Saints123

 

 

Click To View This Thread

03 Aug 2018 17:48:26
Think we're being a bit harsh on Stephens here. There's potential there, and CB's often develop later.

It's time to just keep Gallagher and see what happens. The loan system serves a purpose, but it's time for him to sink or swim. That doesn't mean start him, it just means keep him around and give him whatever opportunities he can earn in training (Cup games, injury fill-ins, etc. ) .

Saints123

 

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Jul 2018 07:08:44
Personally, I don't read too much into preseason results.

We let players go on loan because its the smarter long-term move. Players with potential can go, and potentially excel and improve their transfer value, rather than selling people like Boufal and Carillo while their value is at an all-time low. Also, football finances just don't work as simply as fans like to make out. In getting these players off the wage bill, the board will see it as freeing up £X million. Transfer fees don't tend to be the most expensive part of a signing, and in accounting terms football clubs view them as being spread over the length of a player's contract. So when we sign a player for £10m, and £2 mil a year for 5 years, the club will view this as £4mil per year (this too is simplified of course) . By loaning Clasie, Boufal and Carillo, the board will have freed up, for argument's sake, £5mil in this years accounts which they have the option to invest. So it does still help our finances in the short term.

Saints123

 

 

 

Saints123's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

06 Oct 2018 15:23:14
Exactly - I think it's a gamble to hire a manager like the ones you named as well, in terms of risking continuing our current stagnation.

Thoughts on Carrick? Hardly receiving the best tutelage under Mourinho right now but he's always had an outstanding football brain and seems destined for management eventually.

Saints123

 

 

Click To View This Thread

05 Oct 2018 08:28:30
I agree. Young manager with energy, fresh ideas and ambition. The club needs a shake up. The problem is, that is something which is more effectively done over the summer. So I can see an argument that if we think Hughes will keep us up, we should stick with him until then.

Saints123

 

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Sep 2018 16:15:00
This is the question nobody ever seems to think about when talking about firing a manager!

Can't think of many either to be honest. Allardyce and Moyes spring to mind, but I don't find either of them particularly inspiring.

Saints123

 

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Aug 2018 14:06:37
You're not wrong, but I feel like it's time to move on from that - long time ago now!

Also, I think it's easy to forget that as harsh as it was, things weren't looking great and I think it's fair to say some of our current problems seemed to start under CP. If Pellegrino had come in and done well, then we'd be praising them for having the stones to make a bold move like that. The last time they did, it worked out pretty well (Poch for Adkins) .

Saints123

 

 

Click To View This Thread

23 Aug 2018 10:40:30
Not you specifically Rayzer - was just making the point that the club really can't win. If they don't sign players, they're criticised. If they don't play youth, they're criticised. I think we should all stop trying to over-criticise every decision and just understand whether there is a rational reason for doing what they've done.

To the youth point, I don't necessarily think we've lost touch with the Southampton way, which has been to sign high-potential young players with resale value ever since the new regime took over. It's natural that when we were rising from league 1 to the premier we brought a lot through from our own academy, because we were in a position where these players could grow alongside us. Now we're established in the premier league, we're asking them to make much more of a leap to join the first team, which will lower the number of players we're able to bring through. I agree some of these players need a chance, but we have to be smart about it, because as much potential as Mcqueen, Sims etc. have, if we give them all their chance at once, we start to look a lot like a Championship team.

It's a tough balance to strike, and I think we may have made a mistake not keeping Sims, but I think its unreasonable to expect the same number of academy products in the first team as when we were rising up through the leagues.

Saints123